fast file site

down site
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud must be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder.

You have to share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.

Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from the free account may be the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.